Mark Paine

2.3k citations
33 papers · 1.1k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Paine

33 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Mark Paine
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Ophthalmology 443
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 443
  • Neurology 182
  • Neurology 257
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 114
Replace Deborah Mason with:
Deborah Mason New Zealand
Walter M. Jay United States
Edward Margolin Canada
C S Hoyt United States
Carmel Noonan United Kingdom
Veit Sturm Switzerland
Joachim Esser Germany
Orlando Garcea Argentina
Stacy L. Pineles United States
William R. Kinkel United States
Mark Paine relative to Deborah Mason New Zealand Deborah Mason's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Deborah Mason · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Paine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Paine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Paine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Paine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Paine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Paine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Paine. The network helps show where Mark Paine may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Paine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Paine Line = papers co-authored together Mark Paine links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008131
2 2011107
3 200979
4 200374
5 200573
6 201067
7 201354
8 200052
9 200750
10 200149
11 201743
12 201341
13 201139
14 201033
15 201527
16 201527
17 201224
18 200721
19 200519
20 201113

About Mark Paine

Mark Paine is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology, Ophthalmology, Neurology and Rheumatology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (14 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (5 papers), Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (5 papers), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (5 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (5 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (4 papers), Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders (4 papers) and Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (443 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (443 citations), Neurology (182 citations), Neurology (257 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (114 citations). Mark Paine has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Justin O’Day, Alexander Klistorner, Jessica Vitkovic, Stuart L. Graham, Hemamalini Arvind, Con Yiannikas, Raymond Garrick, Gary Rance, John Grigg and Colin Chan. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, PLoS ONE, International Journal of MS Care, Multiple Sclerosis Journal and Audiology and Neurotology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact