Veit Sturm

1.5k citations
65 papers · 1.0k · h-index 18

Impact in

    • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
    • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Neurology top 10%
    • Vestibular and auditory disorders

Papers in

Veit Sturm

63 papers receiving 994 citations

Peers

Veit Sturm
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Ophthalmology 345
  • Neurology 110
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 176
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 204
  • Neurology 112
Replace Martin Lubow with:
Martin Lubow United States
Rudolph S. Wagner United States
Kristina Prelog Australia
Brian G. Mohney United States
Mark S. Ruttum United States
Özgül Altıntaş Türkiye
Michael S. Vaphiades United States
Joseph H. Calhoun United States
Ata Siddiqui United Kingdom
Itzhak Braverman Israel
Veit Sturm relative to Martin Lubow United States Martin Lubow's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.0×
Martin Lubow · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Veit Sturm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Veit Sturm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Veit Sturm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Veit Sturm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Veit Sturm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Veit Sturm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Veit Sturm. The network helps show where Veit Sturm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Veit Sturm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Veit Sturm Line = papers co-authored together Veit Sturm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008116
2 2012111
3 200886
4 200853
5 200849
6 200949
7 201547
8 201140
9 201139
10 200934
11 202030
12 200829
13 200926
14 200926
15 200926
16 201020
17 198120
18 200819
19 201916
20 200815

About Veit Sturm

Veit Sturm is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Ophthalmology, Epidemiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Surgery, having authored 65 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (15 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (6 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (5 papers), Child Abuse and Related Trauma (3 papers), Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (3 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (3 papers), Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments (3 papers) and Retinal Imaging and Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (345 citations), Neurology (110 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (176 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (204 citations) and Neurology (112 citations). Veit Sturm has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Marcel N. Menke, Pascal B. Knecht, Klara Landau, Jens Funk, R. Michels, Dominik Straumann, Sally M. Rosengren, Konrad P. Weber, Thierry A. G. M. Huisman and Moshe Eizenman. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Acta Ophthalmologica, Eye, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and American Journal of Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact