Gail Soffer

453 citations
8 papers · 218 · h-index 4

Impact in

  • Philosophy top 5%
    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
    • Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
    • Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
    • Philosophy and Theoretical Science
    • Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy

Papers in

    • Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy 5
    • Philosophy and Theoretical Science 1
    • Philosophy and Historical Thought 4
    • Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism 2
    • Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations 1
    • Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel 1

Gail Soffer

8 papers receiving 195 citations

Peers

Gail Soffer
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Philosophy 88
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 81
  • History and Philosophy of Science 20
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 7
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 27
Replace Oswald Hanfling with:
Oswald Hanfling United Kingdom
J. E. Tiles United Kingdom
Mark Okrent United States
Michael Losonsky United States
Giambattista Vico
Kaarlo Miller Finland
Nicholas F. Gier United States
I. A. Richards United States
Hiram Caton Australia
Nenad Miščević Slovenia
Gail Soffer relative to Oswald Hanfling United Kingdom Oswald Hanfling's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Oswald Hanfling · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gail Soffer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gail Soffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gail Soffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gail Soffer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gail Soffer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gail Soffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gail Soffer. The network helps show where Gail Soffer may publish in the future.

No co-authors to show.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 1998183
2 199112
3
Revisiting the Myth: Husserl and Sellars on the Given
20038
4
Phenomenology and Scientific Realism: Husserl's Critique of Galileo
19905
5
Heidegger, Humanism, and the Destruction of History
19963
6 19993
7 19963
8 19971

About Gail Soffer

Gail Soffer is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 8 papers that have together received 218 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (5 papers), Philosophy and Historical Thought (4 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (2 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (2 papers), Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations (1 paper), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (1 paper), Philosophy, Science, and History (1 paper) and Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (88 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (81 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (20 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (7 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (27 citations). Gail Soffer has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Their work appears in journals such as Husserl Studies, Journal of the history of philosophy, ˜The œreview of metaphysics, Continental Philosophy Review and Phaenomenologica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact