Gail Soffer

455 citations
10 papers · 247 · h-index 4

Impact in

  • Philosophy top 5%
    • Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
    • Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
    • Philosophy, Science, and History
    • Philosophy and History of Science

Papers in

    • Philosophy and Historical Thought 5
    • Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism 2
    • Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel 1
    • Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy 6
    • Philosophy and Theoretical Science 1

Gail Soffer

9 papers receiving 206 citations

Peers

Gail Soffer
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Philosophy 103
  • History and Philosophy of Science 43
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 104
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 7
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 28
Replace Mark B. Okrent with:
Mark B. Okrent United States
İlham Dilman United Kingdom
Nicholas F. Gier United States
Amy M. Schmitter Canada
Paul Grice United States
Tim Kenyon Canada
Oswald Hanfling United Kingdom
Derek Brookes Australia
Nenad Miščević Slovenia
Katherine Ritchie United States
Gail Soffer relative to Mark B. Okrent United States Mark B. Okrent's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Mark B. Okrent · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gail Soffer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gail Soffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gail Soffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gail Soffer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gail Soffer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gail Soffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gail Soffer. The network helps show where Gail Soffer may publish in the future.

No co-authors to show.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 1998185
2 199131
3
Revisiting the Myth: Husserl and Sellars on the Given
20039
4
Phenomenology and Scientific Realism: Husserl's Critique of Galileo
19909
5
Heidegger, Humanism, and the Destruction of History
19963
6 19963
7 19993
8 19963
9 19971
10 19940

About Gail Soffer

Gail Soffer is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science and Language and Linguistics, having authored 10 papers that have together received 247 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (6 papers), Philosophy and Historical Thought (5 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (2 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (2 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (2 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (1 paper), Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (1 paper) and Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (103 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (43 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (104 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (7 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (28 citations). Gail Soffer has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Their work appears in journals such as Husserl Studies, Journal of the history of philosophy, ˜The œreview of metaphysics, Continental Philosophy Review and Contributions to phenomenology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact