Mark N. McDermott

589 citations
22 papers · 545 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Mark N. McDermott

21 papers receiving 515 citations

Peers

Mark N. McDermott
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 423
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 161
  • Spectroscopy 189
  • Radiation 67
  • Condensed Matter Physics 42
Replace Hans Kopfermann with:
Hans Kopfermann Germany
Siegfried Penselin Germany
E. Lipworth United States
Josiane Serre France
H. D. Dohmann Germany
H. A. Jahn United Kingdom
Munetake Ichimura Japan
Henry B. Silsbee United States
Gabriele Nowicki Germany
M.V. Mihailović Slovenia
Mark N. McDermott relative to Hans Kopfermann Germany Hans Kopfermann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×14×
Hans Kopfermann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark N. McDermott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark N. McDermott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark N. McDermott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark N. McDermott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark N. McDermott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark N. McDermott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark N. McDermott. The network helps show where Mark N. McDermott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Mark N. McDermott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark N. McDermott Line = papers co-authored together Mark N. McDermott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196066
2 196166
3 196465
4 196447
5 196336
6 196936
7 196933
8 197332
9 196125
10 196719
11 197218
12 196017
13 196315
14 196314
15 196413
16 196911
17 196410
18 19608
19 19736
20
The challenge of the single market
19914

About Mark N. McDermott

Mark N. McDermott is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Spectroscopy, Condensed Matter Physics and Surfaces, Coatings and Films, having authored 22 papers that have together received 545 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (10 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (10 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (9 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (3 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (2 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (1 paper) and Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (423 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (161 citations), Spectroscopy (189 citations), Radiation (67 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (42 citations). Mark N. McDermott has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert Novick, William L. Lichten, F. W. Byron, Nels S. Laulainen, Walter L. Faust, P. W. Spence, E. B. Saloman, P. Thaddeus and W. Faust. Their work appears in journals such as Physics Letters A, Physical Review C, Journal of Cybersecurity, Journal of the Optical Society of America and Physical Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact