Mark M. Williams

822 citations
8 papers · 513 · h-index 5

Impact in

    • Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
    • Insect and Pesticide Research
  • Surgery top 10%
    • Shoulder Injury and Treatment
    • Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation
    • Breast Implant and Reconstruction

Papers in

    • Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation 2
    • Breast Implant and Reconstruction 2
    • Shoulder Injury and Treatment 2
    • Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries 2

Mark M. Williams

7 papers receiving 489 citations

Peers

Mark M. Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Insect Science 159
  • Surgery 297
  • Epidemiology 183
  • Plant Science 139
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 56
Replace Pierre Abadie with:
Pierre Abadie France
F. Gebhard Germany
B.S. Rana India
SreyReath Kuy United States
Jiří Beneš Czechia
Yoshiaki Kon Japan
Omar E. Beidas United States
Dapeng Sun China
John Van Duyn United States
Monika Gangl Belgium
Mark M. Williams relative to Pierre Abadie France Pierre Abadie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.6×
Pierre Abadie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark M. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark M. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark M. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark M. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark M. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark M. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark M. Williams. The network helps show where Mark M. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Mark M. Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark M. Williams Line = papers co-authored together Mark M. Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown

About Mark M. Williams

Mark M. Williams is a scholar working on Surgery, Epidemiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Molecular Biology and Dermatology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 513 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries (2 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (2 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (2 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (2 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (2 papers), Cold Fusion and Nuclear Reactions (1 paper), Insect Resistance and Genetics (1 paper) and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (159 citations), Surgery (297 citations), Epidemiology (183 citations), Plant Science (139 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (56 citations). Mark M. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Stephen J. Snyder, Don Buford, Ying-Tsu Loh, Chuanyou Li, Gregg A. Howe, Christine Laronga, Jeffrey D. Thomson, Stephen J. Stricker, C.E. Cox and Mary R. Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Nuclear Science and Engineering, Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, PLANT PHYSIOLOGY and Breast Diseases A Year Book Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact