Mark M. Span

1.1k citations
16 papers · 820 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Mark M. Span

15 papers receiving 774 citations

Peers

Mark M. Span
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 240
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 230
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 15
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 81
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 200
Replace Nobuo Usui with:
Nobuo Usui Japan
Eliane Correa Miotto Brazil
Thomas G. Burns United States
Jane Holmes Bernstein United States
Virginia M. Rosen United States
Keiko Kunitoki Japan
Brigitte Gilbert France
David Blitzer United States
Catherine Moran Ireland
Mark M. Span relative to Nobuo Usui Japan Nobuo Usui's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Nobuo Usui · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark M. Span

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark M. Span's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark M. Span with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark M. Span more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark M. Span

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark M. Span. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark M. Span. The network helps show where Mark M. Span may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark M. Span, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark M. Span Line = papers co-authored together Mark M. Span links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2004165
2 2002129
3 2009123
4 2005114
5 200579
6 200470
7 200654
8 200620
9 200719
10 200917
11 200613
12 20059
13 20065
14 20182
15
Age related changes in executive control : models, methods and developmental trends
20021
16 20250

About Mark M. Span

Mark M. Span is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Statistics and Probability, having authored 16 papers that have together received 820 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (3 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (2 papers), Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (2 papers), Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (2 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (2 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (2 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (240 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (230 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (15 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (81 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (200 citations). Mark M. Span has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include K. Richard Ridderinkhof, Maurits W. van der Molen, Clark J. Zeebregts, Eric L.G. Verhoeven, Ignace F.J. Tielliu, J.J.A.M. van den Dungen, Conor V. Dolan, Paul Oosterveld, G. Caroline M. van Baal and Jelte M. Wicherts. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vascular Surgery, Brain and Cognition, Brain Research, Diseases of the Colon & Rectum and Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact