Mark Lusk

44 papers receiving 543 citations

Peers

Mark Lusk
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Public Administration 46
  • General Health Professions 282
  • Clinical Psychology 197
  • Urban Studies 54
  • Safety Research 72
Replace Bill O’Grady with:
Bill O’Grady Canada
Tony Vinson Australia
Margot Breton Canada
Lauren B. Gates United States
Samantha Teixeira United States
Joel A. Devine United States
Bree Akesson Canada
Jeanne Katz United Kingdom
Mavis Dako‐Gyeke Ghana
Suzanne Huot Canada
Mark Lusk relative to Bill O’Grady Canada Bill O’Grady's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Bill O’Grady · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Lusk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Lusk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Lusk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Lusk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Lusk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Lusk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Lusk. The network helps show where Mark Lusk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Mark Lusk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Lusk Line = papers co-authored together Mark Lusk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199288
2 198978
3 201553
4 199552
5 201946
6 199536
7 201223
8 198922
9 198620
10 201220
11 201718
12 200817
13 201315
14 202214
15 201413
16 202212
17 201812
18 201711
19 20209
20 19949

About Mark Lusk

Mark Lusk is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Public Administration and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 49 papers that have together received 646 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration, Health and Trauma (10 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (9 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (7 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (7 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (4 papers), Community Health and Development (3 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers) and Metal Extraction and Bioleaching (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (46 citations), General Health Professions (282 citations), Clinical Psychology (197 citations), Urban Studies (54 citations) and Safety Research (72 citations). Mark Lusk has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Poland and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Irene Rizzini, Eva M. Moya, Silvia M. Chávez-Baray, Richard B. Brugam, Kathleen Staudt, Richard Salcido, David Stoesz, Emre Umucu, C. Aaron McNeece and José Luis Rodríguez-Arias Palomo. Their work appears in journals such as International Social Work, Children and Youth Services Review, ESTUDIOS FRONTERIZOS, Journal of Drug Issues and Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact