Mark Leather

20 papers receiving 368 citations

Peers

Mark Leather
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Social Psychology 244
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 42
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 35
  • Education 89
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 22
Replace Jane Waters with:
Jane Waters United Kingdom
Susanna Ho Singapore
Denise S. Mitten United States
Gabriele Lauterbach Norway
Rune Storli Norway
Gabriela Bento Portugal
Kirsti Pedersen Gurholt Norway
Helen Bilton United Kingdom
Marcus Morse Australia
Anne‐Marie Morrissey Australia
Mark Leather relative to Jane Waters United Kingdom Jane Waters's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.5×
Jane Waters · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Leather

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Leather's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Leather with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Leather more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Leather

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Leather. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Leather. The network helps show where Mark Leather may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Mark Leather, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Leather Line = papers co-authored together Mark Leather links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201896
2 202083
3 202259
4 201146
5 202027
6 201219
7 201416
8 201610
9 20258
10 20197
11 20215
12 20184
13
Experiential Education The Importance of John Dewey
20173
14 20173
15 20173
16 20242
17
Mixed methods research: Paradigmatic considerations for outdoor studies
20191
18 20191
19 20201
20
More than fun and games: the serious side to outdoor education
20211

About Mark Leather

Mark Leather is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Computer Science Applications, Communication and Education, having authored 23 papers that have together received 395 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Outdoor and Experiential Education (21 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (4 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (1 paper), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (1 paper), Cultural Studies and Postmodernism (1 paper), Digital Education and Society (1 paper), Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences (1 paper) and Digital Media and Philosophy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (244 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (42 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (35 citations), Education (89 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (22 citations). Mark Leather has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Iceland. Frequent co-authors include Jon Ord, Nevin J. Harper, Kass Gibson and Gunnar Þór Jóhannesson. Their work appears in journals such as Sport Education and Society, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, European Journal of Public Health, History of Education Review and Journal of Education for Teaching International Research and Pedagogy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact