Mark Lance

1.2k citations
43 papers · 569 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Lance

41 papers receiving 436 citations

Peers

Mark Lance
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Philosophy 342
  • History and Philosophy of Science 80
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 194
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 152
  • Language and Linguistics 60
Replace Allan Hazlett with:
Allan Hazlett United States
Timothy Sundell United States
Daniel Whiting United Kingdom
Michael Blome‐Tillmann United Kingdom
Mikkel Gerken Denmark
John Koethe United States
María Alvarez United Kingdom
Gunnar Björnsson Sweden
Max Kölbel Spain
Matthew A. Benton United States
Mark Lance relative to Allan Hazlett United States Allan Hazlett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Allan Hazlett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Lance

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Lance's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Lance with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Lance more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Lance

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Lance. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Lance. The network helps show where Mark Lance may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Mark Lance, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Lance Line = papers co-authored together Mark Lance links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199760
2 201349
3 200436
4 200535
5 199530
6 199825
7 199125
8 201021
9
Defending moral particularism
200617
10 200916
11 199616
12 202016
13 199415
14 200714
15 201413
16 200413
17
Where the laws are
200713
18 199713
19
Stereoscopic Vision: Persons, Freedom, and Two Spaces of Material Inference
200712
20 200712

About Mark Lance

Mark Lance is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, History and Philosophy of Science and Language and Linguistics, having authored 43 papers that have together received 569 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (8 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (7 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (4 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (3 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (3 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (3 papers) and Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (342 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (80 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (194 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (152 citations) and Language and Linguistics (60 citations). Mark Lance has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Margaret Olivia Little, Rebecca Kukla, John O'Leary‐Hawthorne, Philip Kremer, Alessandra Tanesini, Todd May, John Hawthorne and Michael P. Wolf. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Philosophical Logic, Philosophical Studies, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Noûs and The Southern Journal of Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact