Mark Kingston

604 citations
24 papers · 355 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Kingston

22 papers receiving 346 citations

Peers

Mark Kingston
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 12
  • General Health Professions 68
  • Emergency Medicine 22
  • Infectious Diseases 47
  • Emergency Medical Services 15
Replace Harriet Davidson with:
Harriet Davidson United States
Sophie Terp United States
Cláudia Regina Laselva Brazil
Michael A. Peters United States
Winston Wong United States
Susan L. Moore United States
Sheri Eisert United States
Edward Drozd United States
Thierry Lambrechts Switzerland
Christian Theodosis United States
Mark Kingston relative to Harriet Davidson United States Harriet Davidson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.2×
Harriet Davidson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Kingston

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Kingston's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Kingston with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Kingston more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Kingston

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Kingston. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Kingston. The network helps show where Mark Kingston may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Kingston, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Kingston Line = papers co-authored together Mark Kingston links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016165
2 200462
3 201325
4 202122
5 201318
6 200512
7 20208
8 20237
9
Initial uses of the PRISM risk stratification tool in CCM Demonstrator sites: a qualitative study
20106
10
Fatal legionellosis from gardening.
19945
11 20224
12 20243
13 20213
14 20233
15 20223
16 20162
17 20222
18 20201
19 20191
20 20191

About Mark Kingston

Mark Kingston is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Emergency Medicine, Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 24 papers that have together received 355 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primary Care and Health Outcomes (5 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (2 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (2 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (1 paper), Healthcare Systems and Practices (1 paper), Global Health Workforce Issues (1 paper), Nursing Roles and Practices (1 paper) and Hospital Admissions and Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (12 citations), General Health Professions (68 citations), Emergency Medicine (22 citations), Infectious Diseases (47 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (15 citations). Mark Kingston has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Helen Snooks, Alison Porter, Bridie Evans, Hayley Hutchings, C. Twomey, Ian Russell, Denis O’Mahony, Maria O’Donovan, Kieran O’Connor and B. Cryan. Their work appears in journals such as Emergency Medicine Journal, BMJ Open, British Journal of General Practice, Trials and Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact