Mark K. Ashby

818 citations
15 papers · 635 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Mark K. Ashby

15 papers receiving 629 citations

Peers

Mark K. Ashby
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 241
  • Molecular Biology 543
  • Ecology 131
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 85
  • Plant Science 176
Replace Fumiya Taniguchi with:
Fumiya Taniguchi Japan
Veronica L. Stirewalt United States
C. Arnold Germany
Xiaoli Zeng China
Junichi Obokata Japan
Kevin D. Stokes United States
Juliane Neupert Germany
Philippe Heizmann France
Rocío López‐Igual Spain
Chris J. Chastain United States
Mark K. Ashby relative to Fumiya Taniguchi Japan Fumiya Taniguchi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Fumiya Taniguchi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark K. Ashby

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark K. Ashby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark K. Ashby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark K. Ashby more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark K. Ashby

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark K. Ashby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark K. Ashby. The network helps show where Mark K. Ashby may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Mark K. Ashby, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark K. Ashby Line = papers co-authored together Mark K. Ashby links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2006109
2 199980
3 199979
4 199959
5 200452
6 199748
7 199145
8 198733
9 200229
10 200622
11 199022
12 198917
13 200516
14 200215
15 19879

About Mark K. Ashby

Mark K. Ashby is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Ecology, Plant Science and Genetics, having authored 15 papers that have together received 635 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (11 papers), Algal biology and biofuel production (7 papers), Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (4 papers), Protist diversity and phylogeny (3 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (3 papers), Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (2 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (2 papers) and RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (241 citations), Molecular Biology (543 citations), Ecology (131 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (85 citations) and Plant Science (176 citations). Mark K. Ashby has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Jamaica and France. Frequent co-authors include Conrad W. Mullineaux, Jean Houmard, C. Neil Hunter, J. Grant Burgess, Shirley A. Coomber, Peter L. Bergquist, John D. Olsen, Peter McGlynn, Andrew Warry and Eduardo R. Bejarano. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Microbiology, BMC Microbiology, FEBS Letters, Archaea and Photosynthesis Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact