Mark Johnston

3.0k citations
45 papers · 1.9k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Johnston

42 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Mark Johnston
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • History and Philosophy of Science 178
  • Philosophy 416
  • Gastroenterology 162
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 365
  • Surgery 1.0k
Replace Andreas Weber with:
Andreas Weber Germany
Nadeem Hussain United States
Fiona Cowie United Kingdom
Margaret A. Simons United States
Pierre Nicole Canada
T. J. Clark United Kingdom
Christopher Lawrence United States
Ralph Colp United States
Mark E. Steiner United States
Charles G. Roland United States
Mark Johnston relative to Andreas Weber Germany Andreas Weber's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×16.2×
Andreas Weber · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Johnston

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Johnston's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Johnston with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Johnston more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Johnston

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Johnston. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Johnston. The network helps show where Mark Johnston may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Johnston, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Johnston Line = papers co-authored together Mark Johnston links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006306
2 2010198
3 1992170
4 2001164
5 1995144
6 1987134
7 2005132
8 2010106
9 201070
10 199967
11 199460
12 200537
13 200729
14 198828
15 200327
16 201625
17 201625
18 200123
19 200920
20 201718

About Mark Johnston

Mark Johnston is a scholar working on Surgery, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Philosophy and Gastroenterology, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (19 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (9 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (8 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers), Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment (3 papers), Metastasis and carcinoma case studies (3 papers) and Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (178 citations), Philosophy (416 citations), Gastroenterology (162 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (365 citations) and Surgery (1.0k citations). Mark Johnston has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Graeme Forbes, Allan P. Weston, Prateek Sharma, Dean Reker, Richard E. Sampliner, Gary W. Falk, John D. Horwhat, Herbert C. Wolfsen, Julian A. Abrams and Bruce D. Greenwald. Their work appears in journals such as Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, The American Journal of Gastroenterology, Philosophical Issues, The Philosophical Review and Gastroenterology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact