Mark Jaime

517 citations
14 papers · 411 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Jaime

14 papers receiving 404 citations

Peers

Mark Jaime
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 322
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 52
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 50
  • Developmental Biology 7
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 34
Replace Jinfu Shi with:
Jinfu Shi China
A.W.C.J. Hendriks Netherlands
Manuela Schuetze Canada
Dirk Neumann Germany
Laurie‐Anne Sapey‐Triomphe France
Klara Kovarski France
Martine Turgeon United Kingdom
J. Patrick Mayo United States
Paola Buffo Italy
Mark Jaime relative to Jinfu Shi China Jinfu Shi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
Jinfu Shi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Jaime

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Jaime's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Jaime with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Jaime more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Jaime

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Jaime. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Jaime. The network helps show where Mark Jaime may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Mark Jaime, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Jaime Line = papers co-authored together Mark Jaime links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2011123
2 201948
3 202045
4 201541
5 201835
6 201525
7 200924
8 201923
9 201416
10 20219
11 20069
12 20108
13 20243
14
An EEG based Channel Optimized Classification Approach for Autism Spectrum Disorder
20192

About Mark Jaime

Mark Jaime is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Genetics, having authored 14 papers that have together received 411 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (9 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (4 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (4 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (3 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (3 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (2 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (1 paper) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (322 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (52 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (50 citations), Developmental Biology (7 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (34 citations). Mark Jaime has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Sri Lanka. Frequent co-authors include Heather A. Henderson, Lisa C. Newell, Peter Clive Mundy, Sampath Jayarathna, Dulani Meedeniya, Robert E. Lickliter, Camilla M. McMahon, Yasith Jayawardana, Juan Pablo López and Christopher Harshaw. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Animal Cognition, Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience and Developmental Neuropsychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact