Mark J. Morrow

1.4k citations
25 papers · 559 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Mark J. Morrow

24 papers receiving 535 citations

Peers

Mark J. Morrow
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Neurology 173
  • Ophthalmology 158
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 275
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 201
  • Neurology 127
Replace Dieter Schmidt with:
Dieter Schmidt Germany
H.J. Simonsz Netherlands
Phillip D. Kramer United States
A. Komatsuzaki Japan
Robert S. Jampel United States
Anand C. Joshi United States
Stephen E. Thurston United States
O. Meienberg Switzerland
C. Lamirel France
Dik Reits Netherlands
Mark J. Morrow relative to Dieter Schmidt Germany Dieter Schmidt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Dieter Schmidt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark J. Morrow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark J. Morrow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark J. Morrow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark J. Morrow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark J. Morrow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark J. Morrow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark J. Morrow. The network helps show where Mark J. Morrow may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Mark J. Morrow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark J. Morrow Line = papers co-authored together Mark J. Morrow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199489
2 199072
3 199550
4 199343
5 199342
6 201241
7 199037
8 200029
9 201426
10 199722
11 199618
12 201917
13 199212
14 199612
15 199312
16 19919
17 19927
18 20157
19 20175
20
Effects of eye and head position on horizontal and vertical smooth pursuit.
19974

About Mark J. Morrow

Mark J. Morrow is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Ophthalmology, Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Neurology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 559 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (8 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (8 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (6 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (4 papers), Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders (4 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (4 papers), Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (3 papers) and Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (173 citations), Ophthalmology (158 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (275 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (201 citations) and Neurology (127 citations). Mark J. Morrow has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include James Sharpe, Dean M. Wingerchuk, Paul J. Ranalli, Janine L. Johnston, Carol A. Foster, Anthony C. Arnold, Joseph L. Demer, Robert W. Baloh, Melissa W. Ko and Andrew W. Taylor. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Vision Research, Annals of Neurology, CONTINUUM Lifelong Learning in Neurology and Current Treatment Options in Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact