Phillip D. Kramer
Impact in
- Neurology top 5%
- Vestibular and auditory disorders
- Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
- Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
Papers in
- Neurology 10
- Vestibular and auditory disorders 10
- Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis 1
-
- Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders 4
- Co-authors
- David S. Zee (7 shared papers)Elliot M. Frohman (6 shared papers)Teresa C. Frohman (6 shared papers)Dominik Straumann (2 shared papers)Richard B. Dewey (3 shared papers)Vallabh E. Das (1 shared paper)R. John Leigh (1 shared paper)Mark Shelhamer (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Experimental Brain Research (3 papers)Neurology (3 papers)Journal of Vestibular Research (2 papers)Multiple Sclerosis Journal (1 paper)Journal of the Neurological Sciences (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanySwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Phillip D. Kramer
15 papers receiving 456 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Neurology 234
- Ophthalmology 130
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 264
- Sensory Systems 35
- Neurology 101
Countries citing papers authored by Phillip D. Kramer
This map shows the geographic impact of Phillip D. Kramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phillip D. Kramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phillip D. Kramer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Phillip D. Kramer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phillip D. Kramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phillip D. Kramer. The network helps show where Phillip D. Kramer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Phillip D. Kramer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 88 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 78 | |
| 3 | 1996 | 68 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 64 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 55 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 42 | |
| 7 | A versatile stereoscopic visual display system for vestibular and oculomotor research. | 1998 | 27 |
| 8 | 2003 | 24 | |
| 9 | 1998 | 21 | |
| 10 | 1998 | 10 | |
| 11 | 1998 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2000 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2002 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2004 | 3 |
About Phillip D. Kramer
Phillip D. Kramer is a scholar working on Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience, Ophthalmology and Media Technology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 506 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vestibular and auditory disorders (10 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (5 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (4 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (3 papers), Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies (2 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (1 paper), Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (1 paper) and Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (234 citations), Ophthalmology (130 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (264 citations), Sensory Systems (35 citations) and Neurology (101 citations). Phillip D. Kramer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include David S. Zee, Elliot M. Frohman, Teresa C. Frohman, Dominik Straumann, Richard B. Dewey, Vallabh E. Das, R. John Leigh, Mark Shelhamer, D. Solomon and Kathleen Hawker. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Brain Research, Neurology, Journal of Vestibular Research, Multiple Sclerosis Journal and Journal of the Neurological Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.