Mark Hyde
Impact in
- Public Administration top 10%
- Demography top 5%
- Retirement, Disability, and Employment
Papers in
-
- Social Policy and Reform Studies 24
- Political and Economic history of UK and US 5
- Finance 16
- Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism 16
- Co-authors
- John Dixon (18 shared papers)Glenn Drover (4 shared papers)James M. Carlson (2 shared papers)Gladys Ganiel (1 shared paper)Silvia Borzutzky (5 shared papers)Jonathan Moizer (4 shared papers)Martin D. Levine (1 shared paper)Jonathan Lean (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Disability & Society (3 papers)Poverty & Public Policy (3 papers)Social Policy and Society (2 papers)Sociology (2 papers)Critical Social Policy (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesKazakhstan
In The Last Decade
Mark Hyde
48 papers receiving 401 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Public Administration 34
- Demography 107
- Finance 91
- Political Science and International Relations 205
- Accounting 84
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Hyde
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Hyde's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Hyde with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Hyde more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Hyde
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Hyde. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Hyde. The network helps show where Mark Hyde may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Mark Hyde, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 55 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 49 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 32 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 31 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 29 | |
| 6 | 1998 | 29 | |
| 7 | 1996 | 27 | |
| 8 | 1977 | 19 | |
| 9 | 2002 | 16 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 14 | |
| 11 | 1980 | 14 | |
| 12 | 2000 | 14 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 13 | |
| 14 | 1999 | 11 | |
| 15 | 2004 | 8 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 6 | |
| 17 | 1988 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2003 | 5 |
About Mark Hyde
Mark Hyde is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Finance, General Health Professions, Accounting and Demography, having authored 54 papers that have together received 455 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Policy and Reform Studies (24 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (16 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (11 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (9 papers), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (9 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (5 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (5 papers) and Disability Rights and Representation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (34 citations), Demography (107 citations), Finance (91 citations), Political Science and International Relations (205 citations) and Accounting (84 citations). Mark Hyde has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Kazakhstan. Frequent co-authors include John Dixon, Glenn Drover, James M. Carlson, Gladys Ganiel, Silvia Borzutzky, Jonathan Moizer, Martin D. Levine, Jonathan Lean, John R. Dixon and John J. Carroll. Their work appears in journals such as Disability & Society, Poverty & Public Policy, Social Policy and Society, Sociology and Critical Social Policy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.