Mark Hoppé
Impact in
-
- Mosquito-borne diseases and control
- Malaria Research and Control
- Insect Science top 10%
- Insect and Pesticide Research
- Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
Papers in
-
- Insect and Pesticide Research 4
- Genetics 3
- Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior 3
- Co-authors
- John E. Gimnig (1 shared paper)Nicholas Hamon (1 shared paper)Jan Kolaczinski (1 shared paper)Alan J. Magill (1 shared paper)Christen Fornadel (1 shared paper)Clément Kerah Hinzoumbe (1 shared paper)John A. Pickett (1 shared paper)David Schellenberg (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- CHIMIA International Journal for Chemistry (2 papers)The Lancet (1 paper)Insectes Sociaux (1 paper)Pest Management Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Mark Hoppé
6 papers receiving 334 citations
Mark Hoppé's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 267
- Insect Science 90
- Parasitology 35
- Plant Science 105
- Infectious Diseases 26
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Hoppé
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Hoppé's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Hoppé with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Hoppé more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Hoppé
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Hoppé. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Hoppé. The network helps show where Mark Hoppé may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Mark Hoppé, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Averting a malaria disaster: will insecticide resistance derail malaria control? Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 299 |
| 2 | 2016 | 17 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 15 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 2 |
About Mark Hoppé
Mark Hoppé is a scholar working on Insect Science, Genetics, Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 6 papers that have together received 340 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Pesticide Research (4 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (3 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (3 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (2 papers), Insects and Parasite Interactions (1 paper), Plant and animal studies (1 paper), Malaria Research and Control (1 paper) and Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (267 citations), Insect Science (90 citations), Parasitology (35 citations), Plant Science (105 citations) and Infectious Diseases (26 citations). Mark Hoppé has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include John E. Gimnig, Nicholas Hamon, Jan Kolaczinski, Alan J. Magill, Christen Fornadel, Clément Kerah Hinzoumbe, John A. Pickett, David Schellenberg, Peter W. Gething and Frédéric Simard. Their work appears in journals such as CHIMIA International Journal for Chemistry, The Lancet, Insectes Sociaux and Pest Management Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.