Mark Honigsbaum

993 citations
31 papers · 491 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Honigsbaum

28 papers receiving 447 citations

Peers

Mark Honigsbaum
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Modeling and Simulation 48
  • Biological Psychiatry 18
  • Infectious Diseases 128
  • Neurology 77
  • Clinical Psychology 96
Replace Hannah Brindle with:
Hannah Brindle United Kingdom
Eugenia Tognotti Italy
Nidhi Subbaraman India
R. T. Ravenholt United States
Kate O’Brien United Kingdom
Michael McCarthy United States
Julie A. Keating United States
Michelle McPherson Australia
Daisuke Nonaka Japan
Richard Fielding Hong Kong
Mark Honigsbaum relative to Hannah Brindle United Kingdom Hannah Brindle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Hannah Brindle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Honigsbaum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Honigsbaum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Honigsbaum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Honigsbaum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Honigsbaum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Honigsbaum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Honigsbaum. The network helps show where Mark Honigsbaum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Mark Honigsbaum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Honigsbaum Line = papers co-authored together Mark Honigsbaum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202070
2 202063
3 201332
4 201330
5 201729
6 201028
7 201523
8
The fever trail : in search of the cure for malaria
200323
9
The Pandemic Century: One Hundred Years of Panic, Hysteria, and Hubris
201919
10 200918
11 201918
12 201817
13 201817
14 201115
15 201415
16 200814
17
The fever trail: the hunt for the cure for malaria.
200113
18 200911
19
The Fever Trail
200111
20 20164

About Mark Honigsbaum

Mark Honigsbaum is a scholar working on History, History and Philosophy of Science, Infectious Diseases, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 31 papers that have together received 491 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History of Science and Medicine (4 papers), Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (3 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (3 papers), Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research (3 papers), Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research (2 papers), Health and Conflict Studies (2 papers), Influenza Virus Research Studies (2 papers) and Historical Medical Research and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (48 citations), Biological Psychiatry (18 citations), Infectious Diseases (128 citations), Neurology (77 citations) and Clinical Psychology (96 citations). Mark Honigsbaum has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lakshmi Krishnan. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Medical History, Social History of Medicine, History & Philosophy of the Life Sciences and Vaccine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact