Social History of Medicine

1.5k papers and 10.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Social History of Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 10.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Social History of Medicine usually cover History (731 papers), Clinical Psychology (429 papers) and History and Philosophy of Science (268 papers) specifically the topics of Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (453 papers), Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (417 papers) and Historical Economic and Social Studies (193 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Social History of Medicine are Simon Szreter, Eric J. Bartelink, Marius Turda, Abena Dove Osseo-Asare, Bernard Harris, Nadja Durbach, Anne Hardy, Rima D. Apple, Erika Dyck and Peregrine Horden.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Social History of Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Social History of Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Social History of Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in Social History of Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Social History of Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Social History of Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Social History of Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025