Mark H. Wright

20k citations
48 papers · 14.6k · 14 hit papers · h-index 39

Impact in

    • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Genetics top 0.5%
    • Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
    • Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
    • Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities

Papers in

    • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics 20
    • Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals 16
    • Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities 5
    • Evolution and Genetic Dynamics 4
    • Genetic diversity and population structure 2

Mark H. Wright

48 papers receiving 14.4k citations

Mark H. Wright's Hit Papers

Comprehensive analysis of chromothripsis in 2,658 human cancers using whole-genome sequencing 2020 · 489 citations
4890+5+11Years since publication5001k1.5k2k

Peers

Mark H. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
  • Cancer Research 3.8k
  • Genetics 4.8k
  • Plant Science 2.6k
  • Oncology 1.4k
  • Molecular Biology 3.5k
Replace Kui Wu with:
Kui Wu China
Hardeep K. Nahal-Bose Canada
Kathleen H. Burns United States
Gisela Mir Arnau Australia
Huy Q. Dinh United States
Oliver Drechsel Germany
Nuno A. Fonseca Portugal
Joy C. Jayaseelan United States
Marta Tojo United States
Alfonso Muñoz Spain
Mark H. Wright relative to Kui Wu China Kui Wu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Kui Wu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark H. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark H. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark H. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark H. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark H. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark H. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark H. Wright. The network helps show where Mark H. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark H. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark H. Wright Line = papers co-authored together Mark H. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The repertoire of mutational signatures in human cancer
Hit paper breakdown →
20202401
2
Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes
Hit paper breakdown →
20202169
3
Genome-wide association mapping reveals a rich genetic architecture of complex traits in Oryza sativa
Hit paper breakdown →
20111121
4
The evolutionary history of 2,658 cancers
Hit paper breakdown →
2020730
5
Resequencing 50 accessions of cultivated and wild rice yields markers for identifying agronomically important genes
Hit paper breakdown →
2011719
6
Genome-Wide Survey of SNP Variation Uncovers the Genetic Structure of Cattle Breeds
Hit paper breakdown →
2009686
7
Patterns of somatic structural variation in human cancer genomes
Hit paper breakdown →
2020564
8
Comprehensive analysis of chromothripsis in 2,658 human cancers using whole-genome sequencing
Hit paper breakdown →
2020489
9
Analyses of non-coding somatic drivers in 2,658 cancer whole genomes
Hit paper breakdown →
2020428
10 2005389
11
Open access resources for genome-wide association mapping in rice
Hit paper breakdown →
2016382
12 2011327
13
Comprehensive molecular characterization of mitochondrial genomes in human cancers
Hit paper breakdown →
2020319
14
Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes identifies driver rearrangements promoted by LINE-1 retrotransposition
Hit paper breakdown →
2020315
15
Genomic basis for RNA alterations in cancer
Hit paper breakdown →
2020310
16
The landscape of viral associations in human cancers
Hit paper breakdown →
2020293
17 2010244
18 2014237
19 2013224
20 2020190

About Mark H. Wright

Mark H. Wright is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Genetics, Molecular Biology, Plant Science and Information Systems and Management, having authored 48 papers that have together received 14.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (20 papers), Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (16 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (7 papers), Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (5 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (4 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (2 papers), Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer (2 papers) and Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (3.8k citations), Genetics (4.8k citations), Plant Science (2.6k citations), Oncology (1.4k citations) and Molecular Biology (3.5k citations). Mark H. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Susan R. McCouch, Keyan Zhao, Carlos D. Bustamante, Chih‐Wei Tung, Andy Reynolds, Georgia C. Eizenga, Anna M. McClung, Md Liakat Ali, Adam H. Price and Md. Rafiqul Islam. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Nature, Nature Genetics, PLoS ONE and Molecular Biology and Evolution.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact