Mark Grindle
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Human-Computer Interaction top 5%
- Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Papers in
-
- Mobile Health and mHealth Applications 4
-
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 2
- Co-authors
- Rob Polson (3 shared papers)Stephen James Leslie (4 shared papers)Johannes Hendrikus De Kock (2 shared papers)Liz Ellis (1 shared paper)Chris O’Malley (1 shared paper)Maged N. Kamel Boulos (1 shared paper)Trish Gorely (1 shared paper)Andrew Elders (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Scientific Reports (1 paper)Patient Education and Counseling (1 paper)BMJ Open (1 paper)British Journal of Health Psychology (1 paper)BMC Public Health (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaIreland
In The Last Decade
Mark Grindle
12 papers receiving 906 citations
Mark Grindle's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Clinical Psychology 447
- Human-Computer Interaction 93
- Applied Psychology 53
- General Health Professions 204
- Occupational Therapy 36
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Grindle
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Grindle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Grindle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Grindle more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Grindle
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Grindle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Grindle. The network helps show where Mark Grindle may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Grindle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A rapid review of the impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of healthcare workers: implications for supporting psychological well-being Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 607 |
| 2 | 2018 | 144 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 121 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 29 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 1 |
About Mark Grindle
Mark Grindle is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Applied Psychology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Family Practice and Pharmacy, having authored 13 papers that have together received 939 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (4 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Cardiac Health and Mental Health (2 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (1 paper), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (1 paper), Digital Storytelling and Education (1 paper), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper) and Medication Adherence and Compliance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (447 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (93 citations), Applied Psychology (53 citations), General Health Professions (204 citations) and Occupational Therapy (36 citations). Mark Grindle has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Rob Polson, Stephen James Leslie, Johannes Hendrikus De Kock, Liz Ellis, Chris O’Malley, Maged N. Kamel Boulos, Trish Gorely, Andrew Elders, Stephan U Dombrowski and Adrian Hapca. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Patient Education and Counseling, BMJ Open, British Journal of Health Psychology and BMC Public Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.