Mark Goodman

31 papers receiving 196 citations

Peers

Mark Goodman
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Clinical Psychology 59
  • Music 10
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 33
  • Communication 18
  • Gender Studies 19
Replace Lauren Fournier with:
Lauren Fournier United States
Peter Banister United Kingdom
Yiduo Ye China
Larissa Pfaller Germany
Jolien Trekels Belgium
Xenia Hadjioannou United States
Alfredo Guera Miralles Germany
Maye Taylor United Kingdom
Tiffany R. Wang United States
Tim West-Newman New Zealand
Mark Goodman relative to Lauren Fournier United States Lauren Fournier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Lauren Fournier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Goodman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Goodman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Goodman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Goodman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Goodman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Goodman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Goodman. The network helps show where Mark Goodman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Mark Goodman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Goodman Line = papers co-authored together Mark Goodman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Eveningness predicts academic procrastination: The mediating role of neuroticism.
200060
2 202254
3 200919
4 201214
5 200910
6 20069
7 20077
8 20057
9
Stemming the Tide: The Presentation of Women Scientists in CSI
20166
10 20004
11 20084
12 20034
13
Real Emotional Logic: Film and Television Docudrama as Persuasive Practice
20062
14 20092
15 20002
16 19762
17 20172
18 19972
19 20132
20 20231

About Mark Goodman

Mark Goodman is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Communication, Literature and Literary Theory and Music, having authored 41 papers that have together received 224 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender, Feminism, and Media (5 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (4 papers), Music History and Culture (4 papers), Media Influence and Health (3 papers), Science Education and Perceptions (2 papers), Social Media and Politics (2 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (2 papers) and Radio, Podcasts, and Digital Media (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (59 citations), Music (10 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (33 citations), Communication (18 citations) and Gender Studies (19 citations). Mark Goodman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Brian Hess, Martin F. Sherman, Haideh Moghissi, Piotr S. Bobkowski, Thomas P. Guck, Carolyn Adams‐Price, Adebowale Akande, Eugenia Barone, James Sprinkle and Robert M. Coleman. Their work appears in journals such as Media Watch, Diabetic Medicine, American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Journal of Popular Film and Television and Teaching and Learning in Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact