Mark Geppert

33 papers receiving 908 citations

Peers

Mark Geppert
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Biomaterials 287
  • Developmental Neuroscience 35
  • Materials Chemistry 398
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 113
  • Neurology 55
Replace Tingting Ding with:
Tingting Ding China
Junrong Wu China
Sing Ling Chia Singapore
Yiyuan Kang China
Darin Y. Furgeson United States
Huey-Shan Hung Taiwan
Jessica P. Ryman-Rasmussen United States
Sourav P. Mukherjee Sweden
Parwathy Chandran India
Mark Geppert relative to Tingting Ding China Tingting Ding's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Tingting Ding · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Geppert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Geppert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Geppert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Geppert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Geppert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Geppert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Geppert. The network helps show where Mark Geppert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Geppert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Geppert Line = papers co-authored together Mark Geppert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201177
2 201275
3 202173
4 201167
5 201256
6 200952
7 201545
8 201640
9 201139
10 201938
11 201034
12 202030
13 202027
14 201726
15 201222
16 202221
17 202020
18 202020
19 202018
20 202117

About Mark Geppert

Mark Geppert is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Biomaterials, Biomedical Engineering, Immunology and Allergy and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 33 papers that have together received 922 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (15 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (8 papers), Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization (6 papers), Iron Metabolism and Disorders (5 papers), Trace Elements in Health (3 papers), Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles (3 papers), Contact Dermatitis and Allergies (3 papers) and Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (287 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (35 citations), Materials Chemistry (398 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (113 citations) and Neurology (55 citations). Mark Geppert has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Ralf Dringen, Michaela C. Hohnholt, Martin Himly, Sylvia Nürnberger, Albert Duschl, Kristin Schirmer, Ingo Grunwald, Laura Sigg, Karsten Thiel and Charlotte Petters. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Science Nano, Frontiers in Immunology, Nanoscale, International Journal of Molecular Sciences and Neurochemical Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact