Environmental Science Nano

2.5k papers and 63.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.5k papers published in Environmental Science Nano in the last decades have received a total of 63.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Environmental Science Nano usually cover Materials Chemistry (1.5k papers), Biomedical Engineering (635 papers) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (603 papers) specifically the topics of Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (789 papers), Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques (395 papers) and Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications (269 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Environmental Science Nano are Jason C. White, Peng Wang, Baoshan Xing, Taicheng An, Peter J. Vikesland, Xiangke Wang, Wade H. Elmer, Jorge L. Gardea‐Torresdey, Gregory V. Lowry and Shuzhen Zhang.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Environmental Science Nano

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Environmental Science Nano. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Environmental Science Nano.

Countries where authors publish in Environmental Science Nano

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Environmental Science Nano. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Environmental Science Nano with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Environmental Science Nano more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025