Mark Fraser

1.1k citations
25 papers · 793 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

    • Antifungal resistance and susceptibility 16
    • Fungal Infections and Studies 10
    • Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment 2
    • Nail Diseases and Treatments 2

Mark Fraser

24 papers receiving 765 citations

Peers

Mark Fraser
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Microbiology 20
  • Infectious Diseases 419
  • Cell Biology 240
  • Epidemiology 439
  • Clinical Biochemistry 64
Replace Ilse Curfs-Breuker with:
Ilse Curfs-Breuker Netherlands
Maria Carmela Esposto Italy
Rasmus Krøger Hare Denmark
Aradhana Masih India
R. Kappe Germany
Cara Mendrick United States
Maria Anna Viviani Italy
Ada Rita Florio Italy
Mike Birch United Kingdom
Kantarawee Khayhan Thailand
Mark Fraser relative to Ilse Curfs-Breuker Netherlands Ilse Curfs-Breuker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Ilse Curfs-Breuker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Fraser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Fraser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Fraser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Fraser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Fraser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Fraser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Fraser. The network helps show where Mark Fraser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Fraser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Fraser Line = papers co-authored together Mark Fraser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007148
2 201570
3 202069
4 202065
5 201955
6 201755
7 201741
8 202035
9 201934
10 202131
11 202329
12 201028
13 201725
14 201924
15 201818
16 202212
17 201512
18 20159
19 20129
20 20227

About Mark Fraser

Mark Fraser is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, Cell Biology, Plant Science and Pharmacology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 793 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antifungal resistance and susceptibility (16 papers), Fungal Infections and Studies (10 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (9 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (2 papers), Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment (2 papers), Enterobacteriaceae and Cronobacter Research (2 papers), Nail Diseases and Treatments (2 papers) and Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (20 citations), Infectious Diseases (419 citations), Cell Biology (240 citations), Epidemiology (439 citations) and Clinical Biochemistry (64 citations). Mark Fraser has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Andrew M. Borman, Elizabeth M. Johnson, M. Dean Palmer, Colin Campbell, Adrien Székely, Zoe Patterson, Zoe Ann Brown, Christopher J. Linton, Julian Müller and Daniel E. Larcombe. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Mycology, Journal of Fungi, Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Mycopathologia and Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact