Mark Elshaw

642 citations
37 papers · 521 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Elshaw

37 papers receiving 493 citations

Peers

Mark Elshaw
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 149
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 204
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 123
  • Social Psychology 129
  • Human-Computer Interaction 27
Replace Wenbo Li with:
Wenbo Li China
Markus Hofbauer Germany
Julien Diard France
Mouhannad Ali Austria
Ahmad Haj Mosa Austria
Matthias Kerzel Germany
Matthew Q. Hill United States
Eric Chown United States
Christos D. Katsis Greece
Midori Sugaya Japan
Mark Elshaw relative to Wenbo Li China Wenbo Li's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×18×
Wenbo Li · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Elshaw

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Elshaw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Elshaw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Elshaw more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Elshaw

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Elshaw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Elshaw. The network helps show where Mark Elshaw may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Mark Elshaw, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Elshaw Line = papers co-authored together Mark Elshaw links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201971
2 201864
3 200548
4 201742
5 200435
6 201628
7 201320
8 199920
9 201818
10 200516
11 200316
12
Biomimetic Neural Learning for Intelligent Robots: Intelligent Systems, Cognitive Robotics, and Neuroscience
200516
13 202014
14 20069
15 20059
16 20188
17 20088
18 20018
19 20037
20 20057

About Mark Elshaw

Mark Elshaw is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Control and Systems Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 521 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Action Observation and Synchronization (13 papers), Robot Manipulation and Learning (11 papers), Emotion and Mood Recognition (8 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (7 papers), Face recognition and analysis (6 papers), Face and Expression Recognition (5 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (5 papers) and Neural Networks and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (149 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (204 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (123 citations), Social Psychology (129 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (27 citations). Mark Elshaw has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Stefan Wermter, Vasile Palade, Cornelius Weber, Günther Palm, M. Nazmul Huda, Sujan Rajbhandari, Stratis Kanarachos, Chitta Saha, Friedemann Pulvermüller and Christo Panchev. Their work appears in journals such as Neural Networks, Connection Science, Knowledge-Based Systems, Sensors and Actuators A Physical and Neural Computing and Applications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact