Mark Eckblad
Impact in
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 0.2%
- Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
- Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
-
- Mental Health Research Topics
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Papers in
-
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment 4
- Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments 3
- Schizophrenia research and treatment 3
-
- Personality Disorders and Psychopathology 3
- Stuttering Research and Treatment 2
- Co-authors
- Loren J. Chapman (7 shared papers)Jean P. Chapman (4 shared papers)Thomas R. Kwapil (4 shared papers)Michael C. Zinser (3 shared papers)Michael B. Miller (1 shared paper)et al (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Abnormal Psychology (6 papers)Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Mark Eckblad
8 papers receiving 3.4k citations
Mark Eckblad's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Psychiatry and Mental health 2.4k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 909
- Clinical Psychology 1.4k
- Philosophy 636
- Cognitive Neuroscience 765
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Eckblad
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Eckblad's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Eckblad with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Eckblad more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Eckblad
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Eckblad. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Eckblad. The network helps show where Mark Eckblad may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Mark Eckblad, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Magical ideation as an indicator of schizotypy. Hit paper breakdown → | 1983 | 880 |
| 2 | Putatively psychosis-prone subjects 10 years later. Hit paper breakdown → | 1994 | 824 |
| 3 | Magical ideation as an indicator of schizotypy. Hit paper breakdown → | 1983 | 778 |
| 4 | 1986 | 439 | |
| 5 | 1986 | 362 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 296 | |
| 7 | 1994 | 56 | |
| 8 | 2000 | 16 |
About Mark Eckblad
Mark Eckblad is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Education, Social Psychology and Philosophy, having authored 8 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (4 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (3 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (3 papers), Youth Substance Use and School Attendance (3 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (2 papers) and Stuttering Research and Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (2.4k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (909 citations), Clinical Psychology (1.4k citations), Philosophy (636 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (765 citations). Mark Eckblad has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Loren J. Chapman, Jean P. Chapman, Thomas R. Kwapil, Michael C. Zinser, Michael B. Miller, et al and Michael B. Miller. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Abnormal Psychology and Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.