Mark Eccles

461 citations
20 papers · 168 · h-index 6

Impact in

  • Classics top 10%
    • Medieval Literature and History
    • Renaissance Literature and Culture
  • History top 5%
    • Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
    • Scottish History and National Identity

Papers in

Mark Eccles

15 papers receiving 84 citations

Peers

Mark Eccles
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Classics 56
  • History 77
  • Literature and Literary Theory 45
  • Anthropology 25
  • Museology 8
Replace Sir Philip Sidney with:
Sir Philip Sidney
Conor Fahy
T. S. R. Boase
Donald C. Baker United States
Jane Tylus United States
Eugène Vinaver
Ben Lowe United States
Juliet Fleming United States
Charity Cannon Willard United States
Jean Seznec United Kingdom
Mark Eccles relative to Sir Philip Sidney Sir Philip Sidney's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Sir Philip Sidney · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Eccles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Eccles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Eccles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Eccles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Eccles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Eccles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Eccles. The network helps show where Mark Eccles may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Mark Eccles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Eccles Line = papers co-authored together Mark Eccles links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 198448
2 195743
3
Low light level detectors in astronomy
198314
4 196214
5 19588
6 19748
7 19855
8 19825
9 19855
10 19854
11 19934
12
English Renaissance drama : essays in honor of Madeleine Doran & Mark Eccles
19762
13 19882
14 19841
15 19661
16 19901
17 19621
18 19711
19 19821
20 19800

About Mark Eccles

Mark Eccles is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Classics, having authored 20 papers that have together received 168 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (3 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (2 papers), Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (1 paper), Calibration and Measurement Techniques (1 paper), Medieval Literature and History (1 paper), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (1 paper), Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (1 paper) and CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (56 citations), History (77 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (45 citations), Anthropology (25 citations) and Museology (8 citations). Mark Eccles has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Lesotho and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include C. J. Sisson, A. L. Rowse and Richard Knowles. Their work appears in journals such as Notes and Queries, Shakespeare Quarterly, The Modern Language Review, Huntington Library Quarterly and English Literary Renaissance.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact