Mark E. Wilder

30 papers receiving 562 citations

Peers

Mark E. Wilder
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Radiation 103
  • Biophysics 45
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 164
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 182
  • Cancer Research 75
Replace Elizabeth K. Balcer‐Kubiczek with:
Elizabeth K. Balcer‐Kubiczek United States
Antun Han United States
George H. Harrison United States
A. Han United States
Laurie Roizin-Towle United States
Masanori Tomita Japan
E. A. Krasavin Russia
Giuseppe Esposito Italy
T. R. Munro United Kingdom
Sofia Barbieri Italy
Mark E. Wilder relative to Elizabeth K. Balcer‐Kubiczek United States Elizabeth K. Balcer‐Kubiczek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Elizabeth K. Balcer‐Kubiczek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark E. Wilder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark E. Wilder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark E. Wilder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark E. Wilder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark E. Wilder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark E. Wilder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark E. Wilder. The network helps show where Mark E. Wilder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark E. Wilder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark E. Wilder Line = papers co-authored together Mark E. Wilder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198785
2 198364
3 197940
4
Radiobiology of ultrasoft X rays. II. Cultured C3H mouse cells (10T1/2).
198939
5 198939
6 198937
7 198424
8 201422
9 199021
10 197721
11 200720
12 198818
13 198817
14 199015
15 197114
16 198714
17 198413
18 198513
19
Flow cytometric localization within the cell cycle and isolation of viable cells following exposure to cytotoxic agents.
198813
20 200912

About Mark E. Wilder

Mark E. Wilder is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Biophysics and Cancer Research, having authored 31 papers that have together received 599 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Effects of Radiation Exposure (5 papers), Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (5 papers), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (4 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (4 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (3 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (3 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (3 papers) and DNA Repair Mechanisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiation (103 citations), Biophysics (45 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (164 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (182 citations) and Cancer Research (75 citations). Mark E. Wilder has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include James P. Freyer, S.G. Carpenter, M. R. Raju, M. E. Schillaci, L. Scott Cram, D.T. Goodhead, James H. Jett, R. J. Sebring, Emily Tate and Walker Wharton. Their work appears in journals such as Radiation Research, Cytometry, Cytometry Part A, Cell Proliferation and Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact