Mark E. Spellmann

919 citations
15 papers · 704 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Mark E. Spellmann

13 papers receiving 622 citations

Peers

Mark E. Spellmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Clinical Psychology 241
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 121
  • Education 206
  • Safety Research 35
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 54
Replace Daniel Christensen with:
Daniel Christensen Australia
Christina D. Adams United States
Nancy M. Wallace United States
Shannon L. Michael United States
Janet Bonilla Puerto Rico
Derrick Ssewanyana Kenya
Kristina Berg‐Kelly Sweden
Daniela Centenaro Levandowski Brazil
Pamela C. High United States
Paul D. O'Mahony Ireland
Mark E. Spellmann relative to Daniel Christensen Australia Daniel Christensen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Daniel Christensen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark E. Spellmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark E. Spellmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark E. Spellmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark E. Spellmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark E. Spellmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark E. Spellmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark E. Spellmann. The network helps show where Mark E. Spellmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Mark E. Spellmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark E. Spellmann Line = papers co-authored together Mark E. Spellmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2009177
2 2007100
3 200170
4 199668
5 200261
6 199858
7 201257
8 200144
9 201336
10 199716
11 199712
12 20124
13 19981
14 20260
15 20220

About Mark E. Spellmann

Mark E. Spellmann is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Education, having authored 15 papers that have together received 704 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Early Childhood Education and Development (3 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers), Hip disorders and treatments (2 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (1 paper), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (1 paper), Child Development and Digital Technology (1 paper), Birth, Development, and Health (1 paper) and Cognitive and psychological constructs research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (241 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (121 citations), Education (206 citations), Safety Research (35 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (54 citations). Mark E. Spellmann has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Catherine S. Tamis‐LeMonda, Eileen T. Rodriguez, Gayle Luze, Helen Holz Raikes, Kathy R. Thornburg, Beth L. Green, Barbara Alexander Pan, Julieta Lugo‐Gil, Jon Korfmacher and Jacqueline D. Shannon. Their work appears in journals such as Infant Mental Health Journal, Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, The Journal of Pediatrics, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology and Infant Behavior and Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact