Mark E. Newton

5.6k citations
117 papers · 4.8k · h-index 38

Impact in

Papers in

Mark E. Newton

114 papers receiving 4.7k citations

Peers

Mark E. Newton
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Electrochemistry 650
  • Materials Chemistry 2.8k
  • Bioengineering 78
  • Biophysics 148
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 306
Replace D. Schwarzenbach with:
D. Schwarzenbach Switzerland
Jonas I. Goldsmith United States
Yoshihiro Nakato Japan
Hsin-Yu Ko United States
Hiroshi Kobayashi Japan
Olga I. Mićić United States
Ilan Benjamin United States
Alex Shames Israel
A. Wander United Kingdom
JOHN CORISH Ireland
Mark E. Newton relative to D. Schwarzenbach Switzerland D. Schwarzenbach's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15.9×
D. Schwarzenbach · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark E. Newton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark E. Newton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark E. Newton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark E. Newton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark E. Newton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark E. Newton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark E. Newton. The network helps show where Mark E. Newton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark E. Newton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark E. Newton Line = papers co-authored together Mark E. Newton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 117 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016244
2 1998225
3 2020220
4 2012202
5 2013184
6 2006178
7 2013149
8 2010130
9 2006123
10 2012116
11 2012115
12 2008111
13 1999109
14 2014104
15 2008102
16 2018102
17 200099
18 200395
19 200669
20 200467

About Mark E. Newton

Mark E. Newton is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Electrochemistry, Biophysics, Bioengineering and Spectroscopy, having authored 117 papers that have together received 4.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (77 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (19 papers), Electron Spin Resonance Studies (12 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (4 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (4 papers), Particle Detector Development and Performance (3 papers) and Electrodeposition and Electroless Coatings (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electrochemistry (650 citations), Materials Chemistry (2.8k citations), Bioengineering (78 citations), Biophysics (148 citations) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (306 citations). Mark E. Newton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Julie V. Macpherson, J M Baker, Daniel J. Twitchen, Laura A. Hutton, Patrick R. Unwin, David W. Fisher, Ben L. Green, Simon C. Lawson, Philip Meadows Martineau and Andrew Mark Edmonds. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Physics Condensed Matter, Diamond and Related Materials, Analytical Chemistry, Physical Review Letters and Carbon.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact