Mark E. Lush

1.6k citations
21 papers · 1.2k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Mark E. Lush

20 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Mark E. Lush
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Developmental Neuroscience 333
  • Sensory Systems 214
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 541
  • Cell Biology 168
  • Neurology 131
Replace Matthew F. Rose with:
Matthew F. Rose United States
Susan A. Cook United States
Marie-Catherine Tiveron France
Nagesh K. Mahanthappa United States
Holly S. Cate United States
Lynne M. Bianchi United States
Mary C. Whitman United States
Masao Horie Japan
Xiaoling Xie United States
Juan Represa Spain
Mark E. Lush relative to Matthew F. Rose United States Matthew F. Rose's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Matthew F. Rose · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark E. Lush

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark E. Lush's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark E. Lush with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark E. Lush more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark E. Lush

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark E. Lush. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark E. Lush. The network helps show where Mark E. Lush may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark E. Lush, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark E. Lush Line = papers co-authored together Mark E. Lush links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005259
2 2005157
3 2005143
4 2019105
5 201493
6 200575
7 201173
8 202243
9 201442
10 200839
11 200138
12 201234
13 201233
14 202127
15 200725
16 200524
17 201610
18 20223
19 20243
20 20251

About Mark E. Lush

Mark E. Lush is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, Molecular Biology, Developmental Neuroscience and Ecology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nerve injury and regeneration (7 papers), Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling (7 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (6 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (5 papers), Marine animal studies overview (4 papers), Underwater Vehicles and Communication Systems (3 papers), Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases (2 papers) and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (333 citations), Sensory Systems (214 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (541 citations), Cell Biology (168 citations) and Neurology (131 citations). Mark E. Lush has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Ecuador. Frequent co-authors include Luis F. Parada, Tatjana Piotrowski, Mario I. Romero‐Ortega, Q. Richard Lu, M. Douglas Benson, Mark Henkemeyer, Serge Nef, Bryan W. Luikart, Yajuan Liu and Ege T. Kavalali. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Development, Developmental Biology, eLife and Developmental Cell.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact