Mark E. Hilf
Impact in
- Horticulture top 0.5%
- Endocrinology top 0.5%
- Plant and Fungal Interactions Research
Papers in
-
- Plant Virus Research Studies 42
- Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens 27
- Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies 19
- Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics 5
-
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 13
- Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences 12
- Co-authors
- William O. Dawson (22 shared papers)Alexander V. Karasev (9 shared papers)Stephen M. Garnsey (8 shared papers)Siddarame Gowda (11 shared papers)S. M. Garnsey (10 shared papers)Dennis J. Lewandowski (4 shared papers)D. J. Gumpf (4 shared papers)C.L. Niblett (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Virology (11 papers)Phytopathology (8 papers)Plant Disease (6 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (4 papers)PLoS ONE (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBrazilSpain
In The Last Decade
Mark E. Hilf
64 papers receiving 2.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Horticulture 208
- Endocrinology 772
- Insect Science 1.1k
- Plant Science 2.8k
- Biotechnology 450
Countries citing papers authored by Mark E. Hilf
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark E. Hilf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark E. Hilf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark E. Hilf more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark E. Hilf
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark E. Hilf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark E. Hilf. The network helps show where Mark E. Hilf may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark E. Hilf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1995 | 397 | |
| 2 | 1991 | 166 | |
| 3 | 1995 | 160 | |
| 4 | 1994 | 141 | |
| 5 | 1999 | 134 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 122 | |
| 7 | 1993 | 116 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 115 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 113 | |
| 10 | 1989 | 113 | |
| 11 | 1993 | 112 | |
| 12 | 1992 | 95 | |
| 13 | 1997 | 91 | |
| 14 | 2001 | 83 | |
| 15 | 1995 | 69 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 68 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 58 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 58 | |
| 19 | 1997 | 53 | |
| 20 | 2005 | 50 |
About Mark E. Hilf
Mark E. Hilf is a scholar working on Plant Science, Insect Science, Endocrinology, Molecular Biology and Horticulture, having authored 64 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Virus Research Studies (42 papers), Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens (27 papers), Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (19 papers), Plant and Fungal Interactions Research (15 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (13 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (12 papers), Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy (9 papers) and Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (208 citations), Endocrinology (772 citations), Insect Science (1.1k citations), Plant Science (2.8k citations) and Biotechnology (450 citations). Mark E. Hilf has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Spain. Frequent co-authors include William O. Dawson, Alexander V. Karasev, Stephen M. Garnsey, Siddarame Gowda, S. M. Garnsey, Dennis J. Lewandowski, D. J. Gumpf, C.L. Niblett, Marı́a R. Albiach-Martı́ and Jonathan Donson. Their work appears in journals such as Virology, Phytopathology, Plant Disease, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.