Mark E. Casada

70 papers receiving 817 citations

Peers

Mark E. Casada
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Computational Mechanics 279
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 241
  • Insect Science 128
  • Physiology 39
  • Mechanical Engineering 328
Replace Ying Zang with:
Ying Zang China
Graham Thorpe Australia
Simone Pascuzzi Italy
E. Tijskens Belgium
Xinyu Xue China
Emanuele Cerruto Italy
A. O. Raji Nigeria
R. D. Brazee United States
Farman Ali Chandio China
Mark E. Casada relative to Ying Zang China Ying Zang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×18×
Ying Zang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark E. Casada

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark E. Casada's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark E. Casada with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark E. Casada more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark E. Casada

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark E. Casada. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark E. Casada. The network helps show where Mark E. Casada may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark E. Casada, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark E. Casada Line = papers co-authored together Mark E. Casada links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 78 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010127
2 2014110
3 200863
4 201647
5 200637
6 199424
7 200922
8 200921
9 200621
10 200917
11 201217
12 200315
13 201914
14 198914
15 200514
16 201014
17 202013
18 200213
19 201713
20 201312

About Mark E. Casada

Mark E. Casada is a scholar working on Plant Science, Mechanical Engineering, Computational Mechanics, Food Science and Civil and Structural Engineering, having authored 78 papers that have together received 893 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization (21 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (16 papers), Food Drying and Modeling (13 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (11 papers), Granular flow and fluidized beds (10 papers), Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics (10 papers), Plant Surface Properties and Treatments (6 papers) and Aeolian processes and effects (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mechanics (279 citations), Civil and Structural Engineering (241 citations), Insect Science (128 citations), Physiology (39 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (328 citations). Mark E. Casada has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Philippines. Frequent co-authors include Ronaldo G. Maghirang, Josephine M. Boac, Joseph P. Harner, Frank H. Arthur, Kingsly Ambrose, Dirk E. Maier, Paul R. Armstrong, L. J. Hagen, Bhadriraju Subramanyam and Hülya Akdoğan. Their work appears in journals such as Transactions of the ASABE, Applied Engineering in Agriculture, Journal of Stored Products Research, Journal of Economic Entomology and Insects.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact