Mark DeSantis

532 citations
31 papers · 434 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Mark DeSantis

27 papers receiving 397 citations

Peers

Mark DeSantis
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Neurology 111
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 80
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 128
  • Developmental Neuroscience 22
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 83
Replace Colin Hinrichsen with:
Colin Hinrichsen Australia
Takashi Kodama Japan
Christiane Köbbert Germany
Maria N. Pavlova United States
Randolf Riemann Germany
Maria Luisa Lucchi Italy
J.J. Dekker Netherlands
Galen D. Kaufman United States
Ryosei Minoda Japan
J. Destombes France
Mark DeSantis relative to Colin Hinrichsen Australia Colin Hinrichsen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Colin Hinrichsen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark DeSantis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark DeSantis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark DeSantis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark DeSantis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark DeSantis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark DeSantis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark DeSantis. The network helps show where Mark DeSantis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark DeSantis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark DeSantis Line = papers co-authored together Mark DeSantis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197484
2 197778
3 198239
4 198929
5 198828
6 197525
7 199219
8 198018
9 199715
10 200711
11 19799
12
Variability in relationships of arteries and nerves in the human orbit.
19849
13 20068
14 19718
15 19857
16 19777
17 19777
18 19906
19 20036
20 20056

About Mark DeSantis

Mark DeSantis is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology, Surgery, Molecular Biology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 31 papers that have together received 434 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nerve injury and regeneration (4 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (3 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (3 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (3 papers), Biofield Effects and Biophysics (2 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (2 papers) and Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (111 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (80 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (128 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (22 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (83 citations). Mark DeSantis has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Earl Eldred, Andrea B. Maier, Rodney A. Mead, J. W. Duckworth, Ernest N. Albert, Wesley P. Norman, Michael B. Laskowski, Yulia Zak, Bimal C. Ghosh and Bo E. Gernandt. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Neurology, Brain Research, Journal of Experimental Zoology, The American Journal of Gastroenterology and Endocrinology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact