Mark Denham

1.3k citations
35 papers · 916 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Denham

35 papers receiving 904 citations

Peers

Mark Denham
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Developmental Neuroscience 226
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 315
  • Molecular Biology 613
  • Genetics 61
  • Neurology 36
Replace Jeremy S. Toma with:
Jeremy S. Toma Canada
Jiajie Xi China
Elisabeth M. Walczak United States
Mayuri Vijay Thete United States
Neal D. Amin United States
Maria Pereira Sweden
Maria Teresa Dell’Anno Italy
Florentia Papastefanaki Greece
B. C. Blanchard United States
Cooper W Bloyd United States
Mark Denham relative to Jeremy S. Toma Canada Jeremy S. Toma's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jeremy S. Toma · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Denham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Denham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Denham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Denham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Denham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Denham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Denham. The network helps show where Mark Denham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Denham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Denham Line = papers co-authored together Mark Denham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015235
2 201277
3 201170
4 201561
5 201246
6 201539
7 201236
8 200634
9 200934
10 201428
11 201323
12 202021
13 201020
14 202019
15 201216
16 200514
17 202013
18 200512
19 202311
20 200511

About Mark Denham

Mark Denham is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Developmental Neuroscience, Surgery, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Physiology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 916 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (21 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (14 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (10 papers), Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (4 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (4 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (3 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (2 papers) and Nuclear Receptors and Signaling (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (226 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (315 citations), Molecular Biology (613 citations), Genetics (61 citations) and Neurology (36 citations). Mark Denham has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Denmark and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Mirella Dottori, Ernest Arenas, Richard Mollard, Timothy J. Cole, Jessie Leung, Lachlan H. Thompson, Fabia Febbraro, Simon S. Murray, Agnes W. Wong and Junhua Xiao. Their work appears in journals such as Stem Cell Research, Stem Cells, Molecular Neurobiology, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology and American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact