Mark Dean

19 papers receiving 342 citations

Peers

Mark Dean
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • General Decision Sciences 113
  • Safety Research 57
  • Economics and Econometrics 169
  • Marketing 46
  • Management Science and Operations Research 56
Replace Matthias Heinz with:
Matthias Heinz Germany
Adrian Beck United Kingdom
Yuval Salant United States
Joshua C. Teitelbaum United States
Carsten Schmidt Germany
Eugene G. Chewning United States
Michael Menietti United States
Guillermo Moloche United States
Tilman Klumpp Canada
Ronald Peeters Netherlands
Mark Dean relative to Matthias Heinz Germany Matthias Heinz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Matthias Heinz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Dean

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Dean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Dean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Dean more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Dean

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Dean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Dean. The network helps show where Mark Dean may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Mark Dean, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Dean Line = papers co-authored together Mark Dean links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201897
2 201943
3 201838
4 202234
5 201729
6 201624
7 201523
8 202017
9 202116
10 201712
11 20207
12 19916
13 20215
14
From Post-Fordism to 'Post-Holdenism': Responses to Deindustrialisation in Playford, South Australia
20184
15
Health spending is an economic and social investment.
20003
16
Parliament in the periphery: Sixteen years of labor government in South Australia, 2002-2018
20182
17 20202
18 20241
19 20181

About Mark Dean

Mark Dean is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions, General Decision Sciences, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 19 papers that have together received 364 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (5 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (4 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (3 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (3 papers), Digital Economy and Work Transformation (2 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (2 papers) and Innovation, Technology, and Society (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (113 citations), Safety Research (57 citations), Economics and Econometrics (169 citations), Marketing (46 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (56 citations). Mark Dean has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Arab Emirates. Frequent co-authors include John Leahy, Andrew Caplin, Al Rainnie, Pietro Ortoleva, Ian Krajbich, Anja Sautmann, Ray Broomhill, S. M. Pueschel, Henry C. Bodenheimer and Darryn Snell. Their work appears in journals such as The Economic and Labour Relations Review, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Research in Developmental Disabilities, Journal of Political Economy and Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact