Mark Conley

13 papers receiving 563 citations

Mark Conley's Hit Papers

We Ask Men to Win and Women Not to Lose: Closing the Gender Gap in Startup Funding 2017 · 464 citations
4640+3+6Years since publication100200300400

Peers

Mark Conley
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 304
  • Business and International Management 42
  • Gender Studies 157
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 158
  • Accounting 169
Replace Dana Kanze with:
Dana Kanze United States
Alice Wieland United States
Parshotam Dass Canada
Chaim Letwin United States
Cheryl Mitteness United States
Wencang Zhou United States
A. Banu Goktan United States
Joseph Raffiee United States
Yuval Engel Netherlands
Bradley J. Olson Canada
Mark Conley relative to Dana Kanze United States Dana Kanze's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Dana Kanze · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Conley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Conley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Conley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Conley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Conley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Conley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Conley. The network helps show where Mark Conley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Mark Conley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Conley Line = papers co-authored together Mark Conley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1
We Ask Men to Win and Women Not to Lose: Closing the Gender Gap in Startup Funding
Hit paper breakdown →
2017464
2 202047
3 201929
4 201717
5 201915
6
Male and Female Entrepreneurs Get Asked Different Questions by VCs —and It Affects How Much Funding They Get
201714
7 201812
8 20183
9 20252
10 20251
11 20161
12 20211
13 20191

About Mark Conley

Mark Conley is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Sociology and Political Science, Accounting, Health and Applied Psychology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 607 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (5 papers), Private Equity and Venture Capital (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Gun Ownership and Violence Research (2 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (2 papers), Workplace Spirituality and Leadership (2 papers), Organizational Strategy and Culture (2 papers) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (304 citations), Business and International Management (42 citations), Gender Studies (157 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (158 citations) and Accounting (169 citations). Mark Conley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Dana Kanze, E. Tory Higgins, Laura Huang, Tyler G. Okimoto, Damon J. Phillips, Jennifer Merluzzi, Sarah Jack, Scott Shane, Nicolas Sommet and Anatolia Batruch. Their work appears in journals such as Basic and Applied Social Psychology, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, Social Science Research, Scientific Reports and Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact