Mark C. Thies

3.3k citations
119 papers · 2.7k · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

Mark C. Thies

118 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Mark C. Thies
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Biomedical Engineering 1.8k
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 249
  • Filtration and Separation 73
  • Polymers and Plastics 479
  • Analytical Chemistry 293
Replace Youn-Woo Lee with:
Youn-Woo Lee South Korea
Toshitaka Funazukuri Japan
Val J. Krukonis United States
Barbara L. Knutson United States
T. Murugesan Malaysia
Anthe George United States
Frédéric Vogel Switzerland
E. Santacesaria Italy
Dennis J. Miller United States
M. Perrut France
Mark C. Thies relative to Youn-Woo Lee South Korea Youn-Woo Lee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Youn-Woo Lee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark C. Thies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark C. Thies's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark C. Thies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark C. Thies more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark C. Thies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark C. Thies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark C. Thies. The network helps show where Mark C. Thies may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark C. Thies, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark C. Thies Line = papers co-authored together Mark C. Thies links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 119 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987156
2 2018136
3 2018101
4 201887
5 201782
6 200371
7 200469
8 199462
9 200661
10 200959
11 201555
12 200355
13 200254
14 200854
15 200552
16 199851
17 201348
18 201548
19 201046
20 201045

About Mark C. Thies

Mark C. Thies is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Polymers and Plastics, Materials Chemistry and Spectroscopy, having authored 119 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (44 papers), Lignin and Wood Chemistry (38 papers), Fiber-reinforced polymer composites (19 papers), Petroleum Processing and Analysis (14 papers), Thermodynamic properties of mixtures (12 papers), Catalysis for Biomass Conversion (11 papers), Polymer crystallization and properties (11 papers) and Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomedical Engineering (1.8k citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (249 citations), Filtration and Separation (73 citations), Polymers and Plastics (479 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (293 citations). Mark C. Thies has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include Adam S. Klett, Amporn Sane, Robert M. Enick, Ward A. Burgess, Wesley P. Hoffman, Mi Li, Liwen Jin, Arthur J. Ragauskas, Amod A. Ogale and Yi Zheng. Their work appears in journals such as Carbon, Fluid Phase Equilibria, The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research and Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact