Mark C. Piton

926 citations
19 papers · 844 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Mark C. Piton

18 papers receiving 830 citations

Peers

Mark C. Piton
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Organic Chemistry 609
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 121
  • Polymers and Plastics 187
  • Catalysis 65
  • Spectroscopy 146
Replace J. H. McMinn with:
J. H. McMinn United States
D. A. Paquet United States
Bart G. Manders Netherlands
Frank‐Dieter Kuchta Germany
Pascal Hesse Germany
K. Tribe United Kingdom
Johannes Schweer Germany
C. Chorro France
O. F. Olaj Austria
J. Štokr Czechia
Mark C. Piton relative to J. H. McMinn United States J. H. McMinn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
J. H. McMinn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark C. Piton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark C. Piton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark C. Piton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark C. Piton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark C. Piton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark C. Piton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark C. Piton. The network helps show where Mark C. Piton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Mark C. Piton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark C. Piton Line = papers co-authored together Mark C. Piton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 1996132
2 1990128
3 1991108
4 198991
5 198985
6 199357
7 199349
8 199345
9 199042
10 199334
11 199033
12 199010
13 199410
14 19957
15 19946
16 19954
17 19952
18 19901
19 19910

About Mark C. Piton

Mark C. Piton is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Spectroscopy, Polymers and Plastics and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 19 papers that have together received 844 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization (5 papers), Synthesis and properties of polymers (3 papers), Liquid Crystal Research Advancements (3 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (3 papers), Chemical Reactions and Mechanisms (2 papers), Photopolymerization techniques and applications (2 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (2 papers) and Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (609 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (121 citations), Polymers and Plastics (187 citations), Catalysis (65 citations) and Spectroscopy (146 citations). Mark C. Piton has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Australia and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Mitchell A. Winnik, K. F. O’Driscoll, Thomas P. Davis, Robert G. Gilbert, Paul A. Clay, Scott H. Kable, Donald H. Napper, Bart G. Manders, Bogdan E. Chapman and Bradley R. Morrison. Their work appears in journals such as Macromolecules, Polymer International, Review of Scientific Instruments, Journal of Polymer Science Part A Polymer Chemistry and Canadian Journal of Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact