Mark Bülow
Impact in
- Filtration and Separation top 1%
- Chemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions
- Catalysis top 2%
- Ionic liquids properties and applications
Papers in
- Catalysis 11
- Ionic liquids properties and applications 11
- Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions 2
-
- Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics 6
- Co-authors
- Christoph Held (13 shared papers)João A. P. Coutinho (2 shared papers)Emanuel A. Crespo (2 shared papers)Simão P. Pinho (2 shared papers)Mónia A. R. Martins (2 shared papers)Liliana P. Silva (2 shared papers)Guilherme J. Máximo (1 shared paper)Eduardo Augusto Caldas Batista (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Mark Bülow
14 papers receiving 636 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Filtration and Separation 231
- Catalysis 387
- Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 153
- Electrochemistry 51
- Analytical Chemistry 59
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Bülow
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Bülow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Bülow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Bülow more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Bülow
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Bülow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Bülow. The network helps show where Mark Bülow may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Mark Bülow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 282 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 75 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 58 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 52 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 50 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 19 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2025 | 5 |
About Mark Bülow
Mark Bülow is a scholar working on Catalysis, Biomedical Engineering, Organic Chemistry, Filtration and Separation and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, having authored 14 papers that have together received 638 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ionic liquids properties and applications (11 papers), Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (6 papers), Chemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions (4 papers), Thermodynamic properties of mixtures (3 papers), Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions (2 papers), Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure (2 papers), Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability (1 paper) and Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Filtration and Separation (231 citations), Catalysis (387 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (153 citations), Electrochemistry (51 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (59 citations). Mark Bülow has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Russia and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Christoph Held, João A. P. Coutinho, Emanuel A. Crespo, Simão P. Pinho, Mónia A. R. Martins, Liliana P. Silva, Guilherme J. Máximo, Eduardo Augusto Caldas Batista, Xiaoyan Ji and Gabriele Sadowski. Their work appears in journals such as Fluid Phase Equilibria, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, ChemistryOpen, Journal of Molecular Liquids and RSC Advances.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.