Mark Bodner

2.1k citations
54 papers · 1.7k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Bodner

51 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Mark Bodner
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 867
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 293
  • Neurology 69
  • Sensory Systems 40
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 125
Replace Nick J. Davis with:
Nick J. Davis United Kingdom
Vincent Wens Belgium
Norman D. Cook Japan
Seong‐Gi Kim United States
R.D. Hichwa United States
Andrew M. Peters United Kingdom
Lars Kasper Switzerland
Fa‐Hsuan Lin Taiwan
Daniel J. Mitchell United Kingdom
Antti I. Ahonen Finland
Mark Bodner relative to Nick J. Davis United Kingdom Nick J. Davis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Nick J. Davis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Bodner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Bodner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Bodner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Bodner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Bodner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Bodner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Bodner. The network helps show where Mark Bodner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Bodner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Bodner Line = papers co-authored together Mark Bodner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000416
2 2007163
3 1996118
4 201685
5 199163
6 200160
7 200546
8 199043
9 200543
10 201242
11 201839
12 200935
13 201835
14 201533
15 201432
16 201732
17 201826
18 200525
19 201124
20 201224

About Mark Bodner

Mark Bodner is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Applied Mathematics and Statistics and Probability, having authored 54 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (21 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (8 papers), Finite Group Theory Research (4 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (4 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (4 papers), Fullerene Chemistry and Applications (4 papers), Mathematical Analysis and Transform Methods (3 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (867 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (293 citations), Neurology (69 citations), Sensory Systems (40 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (125 citations). Mark Bodner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Joaquı́n M. Fuster, James K. Kroger, Yongdi Zhou, Yixuan Ku, Ana Cristina Cadavid, Bard Ermentrout, Gordon L. Shaw, Mouhsin M. Shafi, S. Ferrara and Carson C. Chow. Their work appears in journals such as Neurological Research, PLoS ONE, Neuroscience, Classical and Quantum Gravity and Journal of Neurophysiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact