Mark Bloch

20 papers receiving 399 citations

Peers

Mark Bloch
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Family Practice 31
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 76
  • Emergency Medicine 98
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 49
  • Emergency Medical Services 59
Replace Kristen Nelson-McMillan with:
Kristen Nelson-McMillan United States
Marta Los Arcos Spain
Colette C. Mull United States
Kristen Nelson McMillan United States
Kelly L. Dodge United States
Todd A. Seigel United States
Paul H. Mayo United States
Seshadri C. Mudumbai United States
Mary E. McBride United States
Jacques Neelankavil United States
Mark Bloch relative to Kristen Nelson-McMillan United States Kristen Nelson-McMillan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Kristen Nelson-McMillan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Bloch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Bloch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Bloch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Bloch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Bloch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Bloch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Bloch. The network helps show where Mark Bloch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Bloch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Bloch Line = papers co-authored together Mark Bloch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003105
2 201257
3 201444
4 200939
5 201337
6 200234
7 201331
8 201619
9 200215
10 20129
11 20037
12 20006
13 20145
14 20155
15 20184
16 20233
17 20151
18 20091
19 20001
20 20121

About Mark Bloch

Mark Bloch is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Emergency Medicine, having authored 22 papers that have together received 425 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (4 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (3 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (3 papers), Respiratory and Cough-Related Research (3 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (3 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers), Abdominal Trauma and Injuries (2 papers) and Pregnancy-related medical research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (31 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (76 citations), Emergency Medicine (98 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (49 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (59 citations). Mark Bloch has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Keith Porter, Ian Greaves, Adam Hewitt‐Smith, Mervyn Maze, David A. Conner, David Newble, D.P. Dob, Adrian Shephard, Kevin Haire and Susan Young. Their work appears in journals such as Emergency Medicine Journal, British Journal of Anaesthesia, European Journal of General Practice, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care and Anesthesia & Analgesia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact