Mark Bloch

873 citations
22 papers · 455 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Bloch

20 papers receiving 426 citations

Peers

Mark Bloch
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 68
  • Emergency Medicine 69
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 37
  • Family Practice 14
  • Emergency Medical Services 36
Replace Pierre M. van Grunsven with:
Pierre M. van Grunsven Netherlands
Kathy A. Short United States
Paul H. Mayo United States
Colette C. Mull United States
Vesa Lund Finland
Henrik Fischer Austria
Miriam J. P. Harnett United States
Marc Ziegenfuss Australia
Robert Harwood United States
Karel Habig Australia
Mark Bloch relative to Pierre M. van Grunsven Netherlands Pierre M. van Grunsven's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Pierre M. van Grunsven · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Bloch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Bloch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Bloch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Bloch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Bloch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Bloch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Bloch. The network helps show where Mark Bloch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Bloch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Bloch Line = papers co-authored together Mark Bloch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003113
2 201262
3 201445
4 200943
5 201339
6 200236
7 201331
8 201621
9 200215
10 201210
11 20038
12 20006
13 20146
14 20185
15 20155
16 20234
17 20002
18 20011
19 20091
20 20151

About Mark Bloch

Mark Bloch is a scholar working on Surgery, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Physiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 22 papers that have together received 455 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (4 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (3 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (3 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (3 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers), Pregnancy-related medical research (2 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (2 papers) and Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (68 citations), Emergency Medicine (69 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (37 citations), Family Practice (14 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (36 citations). Mark Bloch has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Keith Porter, Ian Greaves, Adam Hewitt‐Smith, Mervyn Maze, David A. Conner, D.P. Dob, Adrian Shephard, David Newble, Ian Scott and Marc Russo. Their work appears in journals such as Emergency Medicine Journal, European Journal of General Practice, Pain Management, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care and Anesthesia & Analgesia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact