Mark Austin

9 papers receiving 417 citations

Peers

Mark Austin
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Hepatology 66
  • Epidemiology 224
  • Applied Psychology 33
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 47
  • Clinical Psychology 50
Replace Rebecca C. Trenz with:
Rebecca C. Trenz United States
Richard F. Armenta United States
Omid Massah Iran
Ken Checinski United Kingdom
Michael S. Shopshire United States
Zahra Alammehrjerdi Australia
Mandy D. Owens United States
Priscilla Martínez United States
Ramez Bathish Australia
Nathan K. Risk United States
Mark Austin relative to Rebecca C. Trenz United States Rebecca C. Trenz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Rebecca C. Trenz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Austin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Austin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Austin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Austin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Austin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Austin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Austin. The network helps show where Mark Austin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Austin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Austin Line = papers co-authored together Mark Austin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2004194
2 2005156
3 202037
4 202019
5 201812
6 20169
7 20144
8 20192
9
TOURNIQUET USE DOES NOT AFFECT FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES OR PAIN AFTER TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY: A PROSPECTIVE, DOUBLE-BLINDED, RANDOMIZED TRIAL
20181

About Mark Austin

Mark Austin is a scholar working on Hepatology, Epidemiology, Surgery, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and General Health Professions, having authored 9 papers that have together received 434 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Liver Disease and Transplantation (4 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (1 paper), Homelessness and Social Issues (1 paper), Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (1 paper), Gambling Behavior and Treatments (1 paper) and Blood transfusion and management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (66 citations), Epidemiology (224 citations), Applied Psychology (33 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (47 citations) and Clinical Psychology (50 citations). Mark Austin has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Nancy M. Petry, Kathleen M. Carroll, Bruce J. Rounsaville, Charla Nich, Sheila M. Alessi, Sumita Verma, Lucia Macken, Stephen Bremner, Max Cooper and Catherine Evans. Their work appears in journals such as Addiction, Journal of Hepatology, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Trials and Journal of Pain and Symptom Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact