Mark Ashton

13 papers receiving 279 citations

Peers

Mark Ashton
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Inorganic Chemistry 83
  • Sensory Systems 20
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 60
  • Organic Chemistry 91
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 8
Replace Daniel G. Shore with:
Daniel G. Shore Canada
Chung K. Rhee South Korea
Laurie B. Schenkel United States
Miguel A. Maria‐Solano Spain
Junya Ishida Japan
János Éles Hungary
Andrew T. Placzek United States
David A. Favor United States
Jean‐Michel Adam Switzerland
János Kóti Hungary
Mark Ashton relative to Daniel G. Shore Canada Daniel G. Shore's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Daniel G. Shore · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Ashton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Ashton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Ashton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Ashton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Ashton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Ashton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Ashton. The network helps show where Mark Ashton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Ashton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Ashton Line = papers co-authored together Mark Ashton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 1998114
2 200268
3 200539
4 202026
5 199514
6 200410
7 20069
8 19953
9 20242
10 20202
11 19782
12 20201
13
Current research and development of treatments for Alzheimer’s disease
20101
14
Current and future options for the management of heart failure
20111
15
Current research and development of new treatments for schizophrenia
20110

About Mark Ashton

Mark Ashton is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Insect Science and Infectious Diseases, having authored 15 papers that have together received 292 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (3 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (2 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (1 paper), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (1 paper), Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects (1 paper), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (1 paper), Insect Resistance and Genetics (1 paper) and Biotin and Related Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Inorganic Chemistry (83 citations), Sensory Systems (20 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (60 citations), Organic Chemistry (91 citations) and Process Chemistry and Technology (8 citations). Mark Ashton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include D. J. BAYSTON, Anthony D. Baxter, M. E. C. POLYWKA, Peter Willett, Florence Casset, Geoffrey M. Downs, M. Charlton, John D. Holliday, Roger Lahana and Alain‐Dominique Gorse. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening, The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology and The American Historical Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact