Mark Ashton
Impact in
- Molecular Medicine top 5%
- Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
- Pharmaceutical Science top 5%
Papers in
-
- Conducting polymers and applications 6
- Co-authors
- Kalliopi Dodou (4 shared papers)Finn Valentin (3 shared papers)R. Farley (2 shared papers)Dali Cheng (1 shared paper)John G. Hardy (14 shared papers)Otto Meth‐Cohn (1 shared paper)Fukun Shi (1 shared paper)Juergen F. Kolb (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Pharmaceutics (2 papers)Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics (2 papers)Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (2 papers)Tetrahedron (1 paper)Materials Advances (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomTürkiyeGermany
In The Last Decade
Mark Ashton
26 papers receiving 718 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Molecular Medicine 106
- Pharmaceutical Science 81
- Biomaterials 164
- Polymers and Plastics 104
- Computational Mechanics 136
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Ashton
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Ashton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Ashton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Ashton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Ashton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Ashton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Ashton. The network helps show where Mark Ashton may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Ashton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 217 | |
| 2 | 1965 | 117 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 103 | |
| 4 | 1964 | 90 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 35 | |
| 6 | 1966 | 27 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 22 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 4 |
About Mark Ashton
Mark Ashton is a scholar working on Polymers and Plastics, Materials Chemistry, Pharmaceutical Science, Biomedical Engineering and Biomaterials, having authored 27 papers that have together received 739 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Conducting polymers and applications (6 papers), Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery (4 papers), Silk-based biomaterials and applications (3 papers), Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials (3 papers), Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (2 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers), Metal Forming Simulation Techniques (2 papers) and Skin Protection and Aging (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (106 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (81 citations), Biomaterials (164 citations), Polymers and Plastics (104 citations) and Computational Mechanics (136 citations). Mark Ashton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Türkiye and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Kalliopi Dodou, Finn Valentin, R. Farley, Dali Cheng, John G. Hardy, Otto Meth‐Cohn, Fukun Shi, Juergen F. Kolb, Rainer Detsch and C.P. Schofield. Their work appears in journals such as Pharmaceutics, Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tetrahedron and Materials Advances.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.