C.P. Schofield

1.9k citations
43 papers · 1.6k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

C.P. Schofield

42 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

C.P. Schofield
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Animal Science and Zoology 206
  • Small Animals 186
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 440
  • Plant Science 717
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 103
Replace C.E.B. Romanini with:
C.E.B. Romanini Belgium
Claudia Bahr Belgium
Joao Ricardo Reboucas Dórea United States
Mark G Trotter Australia
Cameron Clark Australia
Guanghui Teng China
Sabrina Lomax Australia
Dave L. Swain Australia
C. Lokhorst Netherlands
Daihee Park South Korea
C.P. Schofield relative to C.E.B. Romanini Belgium C.E.B. Romanini's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×7.0×
C.E.B. Romanini · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C.P. Schofield

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C.P. Schofield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.P. Schofield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.P. Schofield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C.P. Schofield

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.P. Schofield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.P. Schofield. The network helps show where C.P. Schofield may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C.P. Schofield, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C.P. Schofield Line = papers co-authored together C.P. Schofield links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995450
2 1997213
3 199996
4 199084
5 199170
6 200164
7 200657
8 200455
9 200352
10 200845
11 200544
12 199942
13 200036
14 200435
15 199330
16 200426
17 200317
18
Imaging systems to improve stockmanship in pig production.
198816
19 200512
20 200311

About C.P. Schofield

C.P. Schofield is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Plant Science, Agronomy and Crop Science, Small Animals and Genetics, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smart Agriculture and AI (26 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (10 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (8 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (6 papers), Livestock Farming and Management (5 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (5 papers), Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis (3 papers) and Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (206 citations), Small Animals (186 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (440 citations), Plant Science (717 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (103 citations). C.P. Schofield has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include N.J.B. McFarlane, C. T. Whittemore, Darren Michael Green, R.P. White, John A. Marchant, C.M. Wathes, Jeffrey A. Lines, T.T.F. Mottram, A.R. Frost and A.V. Fisher. Their work appears in journals such as Animal Science, Meat Science, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture and Animal Welfare.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact