Mark A. Salisbury

491 citations
21 papers · 365 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Mark A. Salisbury

19 papers receiving 296 citations

Peers

Mark A. Salisbury
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Instrumentation 47
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 100
  • Dermatology 49
  • Genetics 57
  • Surgery 148
Replace Carlos Chavarría with:
Carlos Chavarría Spain
Yongjung Kim United States
M Pauer Germany
Jennifer Christensen Denmark
Lars Lund Thomsen United Kingdom
Mayra Lebron Puerto Rico
W. Glenn Lyle United States
Seval Taşdemir Türkiye
Hanguo Wang China
Tateki Goto Japan
Mark A. Salisbury relative to Carlos Chavarría Spain Carlos Chavarría's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×57×
Carlos Chavarría · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark A. Salisbury

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark A. Salisbury's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark A. Salisbury with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark A. Salisbury more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark A. Salisbury

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark A. Salisbury. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark A. Salisbury. The network helps show where Mark A. Salisbury may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Mark A. Salisbury, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark A. Salisbury Line = papers co-authored together Mark A. Salisbury links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998113
2 202356
3 200045
4 201935
5 200525
6 201319
7 201813
8 200111
9 20048
10 20207
11 20016
12 19786
13 20196
14 20105
15 20023
16 20062
17 20212
18
An investigation of GSC 02038-00293, a suspected RS CVn star, using CCD photometry
20131
19 20071
20 20251

About Mark A. Salisbury

Mark A. Salisbury is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Surgery, Dermatology and Oncology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 365 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (8 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (6 papers), Body Contouring and Surgery (6 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (3 papers), Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues (2 papers), Genital Health and Disease (2 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (2 papers) and Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (47 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (100 citations), Dermatology (49 citations), Genetics (57 citations) and Surgery (148 citations). Mark A. Salisbury has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robert A. Ersek, Peter Chang, RICHARD P. BURDEN, Richard A. Mladick, R.W. Blamey, M S Knapp, A. J. Norton, Ulrich C. Kolb, Arthur Haswell and Paul B. Benni. Their work appears in journals such as Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, New Astronomy and The Astronomical Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact