This map shows the geographic impact of research published in New Astronomy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in New Astronomy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites New Astronomy more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in New Astronomy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in New Astronomy.
About New Astronomy
The 2.1k papers published in New Astronomy in the last decades have received a total of 24.8k indexed citations . Papers published in New Astronomy usually cover Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.9k papers), Instrumentation (286 papers), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (469 papers), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (135 papers) and Oceanography (96 papers) specifically the topics of Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (951 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (706 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (424 papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (348 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (337 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (329 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (286 papers) and Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (264 papers). The most active scholars publishing in New Astronomy are Noam Soker, F. Aharonian, Jeremy Goodman, Pavel Kroupa, Thomas Quinn, Joachim Stadel, Lorenzo Iorio, James Wadsley, Adnan Malik and Nir J. Shaviv.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.