Mark A. Lemley

10.7k citations
274 papers · 3.9k · h-index 31

Impact in

Papers in

Mark A. Lemley

247 papers receiving 3.6k citations

Peers

Mark A. Lemley
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 2.4k
  • Economics and Econometrics 2.3k
  • Strategy and Management 734
  • Marketing 415
  • Accounting 509
Replace James Bessen with:
James Bessen United States
Suzanne Scotchmer United States
Pamela Samuelson United States
Christian Matt Germany
Martin Peitz Germany
Andrew P. McAfee United States
Joachim Henkel Germany
Christian Fisch Germany
Robert Seamans United States
Paul Belleflamme Belgium
Mark A. Lemley relative to James Bessen United States James Bessen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
James Bessen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark A. Lemley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark A. Lemley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark A. Lemley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark A. Lemley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark A. Lemley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark A. Lemley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark A. Lemley. The network helps show where Mark A. Lemley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark A. Lemley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark A. Lemley Line = papers co-authored together Mark A. Lemley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 274 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005355
2 2001219
3 2011177
4 2002124
5 2002101
6 1998100
7 200095
8 201394
9 200180
10 200477
11 201674
12 200372
13 201670
14 199859
15
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
200857
16 200956
17 199855
18 201052
19 200350
20
Extreme Value or Trolls on Top - The Characteristics of the Most-Litigated Patents
200944

About Mark A. Lemley

Mark A. Lemley is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Economics and Econometrics, Law, Marketing and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 274 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intellectual Property and Patents (139 papers), Copyright and Intellectual Property (51 papers), Intellectual Property Law (46 papers), Law, AI, and Intellectual Property (39 papers), Innovation Policy and R&D (34 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (21 papers), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (21 papers) and Merger and Competition Analysis (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (2.4k citations), Economics and Econometrics (2.3k citations), Strategy and Management (734 citations), Marketing (415 citations) and Accounting (509 citations). Mark A. Lemley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Carl Shapiro, Bhaven N. Sampat, John R. Allison, Dan L. Burk, Julie E. Cohen, David McGowan, Christopher Anthony Cotropia, Robin Feldman, Eugene Volokh and Mark Weston Janis. Their work appears in journals such as California Law Review, Texas law review, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Stanford Law Review and Duke Law Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact